Who is the author?
Read more about Laura and the blog:
If you have any questions about the blog, email me at lkspringer AT gmail DOT com
NOTE: Only substantive and on-topic comments, as determined by the author, will be approved.
Subscribe in a reader
December 2016 M T W T F S S « Sep 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Copyright Notice© Laura Springer and Who in the World Are We?, 2005-2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Laura Springer and Who in the World Are We? with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Two lives were taken overnight,
their bodies left along my transit route.
I was annoyed at the inconvenience,
until I was ashamed of my annoyance.
We are fragile.
We too easily bow to our familial human stain.
We too easily see reality only through our eyes,
setting aside other eyes and other lives.
Two lives taken,
their bodies left for others to find,
a horror left for others to see.
[Written by Laura Springer regarding incidents that occurred on September 2, 2016 in Los Angeles County.]
More than any other teacher, Dr. Robert Saucy taught me how to think theologically. His deep trust in Jesus, keen mind, ever-present curiosity, and humor modeled before me and so many students before and after what it looked like to follow Jesus with all your mind, heart, soul, and strength. He is the best example of life well lived that I have ever known and I will be forever grateful for the hours respectful conversation, good humor, and theological pondering as he guided me through my Th.M. thesis. Beyond the doctrine of the church, he taught me what it looks like to love the church. I will miss him.
Late afternoon on March 12, 2015, Robert Saucy walked into the presence of his beloved Savior. Blessed be the name of the Lord.
11 Reasons to Make Space for Different Worship Cultures (a rif on 11 Reasons to Stop Offering Different “Worship Styles”)
First a bit of clarity.
I read 11 Reasons to Stop Offering Different “Worship Styles” from the perspective of a long-time contemporary worship musician, lover of traditional hymns, and theologically trained ponderer. Much of what the author says needs to be heard (and I fully recommend that you read the article for yourself and ponder its messages). Of particular importance are his observations about the dividing of the Church and the focus on evangelism in some worship gatherings. On the other hand, I think it the article is America-centric and lacks a macro-view of the doctrine of the church. What follows are my off the top of my head ecclesio-morphs of Jonathan‘s eleven points. I’ve also commented on the original post.
I am not advocating what some call “blended worship.” I find it to be a hodgepodge that annoys many and pleases few. What I am advocating is that the expression of communal worship in any particular congregation ought to be shaped by the actual culture(s) of that congregation. Leaders in the congregation are responsible for making space for that expression and keeping the expression centered on Jesus, not for deciding what expression is allowed or best.
- Making space creates space for heart expression. Art is very cultural and, while we can appreciate art outside our culture, we best express our hearts with art from our culture. Making space for different worship styles encourages heart expression.
- Making space connects people by culture rather than age. While some worship styles have a predominance of one age group or another, none is purely so. Making space for different worship styles encourages community across age ranges. It also encourages each generation of believers to look ahead to what is coming rather than merely behind to the way things have always been.
- Making space communicates the every growing community that is the body of Christ. The body of Christ is not trapped in any one culture, but moves across time and geography (and therefore cultures). Making space for different worship styles encourages people to appreciate and experience the growing edge. It also encourages new generations of believers to express traditional hymns according to their own culture.
- Making space encourages each community and member to express their worship of God according to their own cultures, rather than assuming that any particular cultural expression is the most appropriate. It also makes space for newcomers to join the community and be themselves rather than conforming to what is expected.
- Making space helps believers to understand the multi-faceted glory of God, while remaining steadfast in truth. It encourages believers to ponder their beliefs from different perspectives and to hear the other respectfully.
- Making space opens worship to varying expressions rather than restricting it to music. Each person’s and community’s offering can be presented and respected. Making space invites all believers to worship God as persons in community.
- Making space creates a structure upon which artistic expression, declaration, preaching, participating, and learning might be offered. It supports the every member ministry taught by Ephesians 4.
- Making space enables persons in community to be who they are in community, while centered on Christ. It encourages believers to offer variegated expression of the worship in the gathering.
- Making space creates an other-centered atmosphere. It makes space for sundry cultural expressions, all centered on Jesus Christ, for the benefit of the body of Christ.
- Making space encourages believers to remember that Christ’s body goes beyond culture, nation, race, or language. It breaks down barriers and reorients self- and culture-centeredness.
- Making space reminds believers that the worship gathering is about each person and church expressing worship and praise to Jesus, in the context of community and for the growth of the body of Christ. It reminds believers that God is the center and recipient of worship and that we bring ourselves, just as we are, to his throne with the expectation that he alone can transform us into the image of his Son.
ecclesio-morphs, a term I just created, basically means rethinking the argument/thoughts of another from my ecclesiological perspective.